<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 539 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191526</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal to consider substantial questions of law raised regarding recovery of duty under Rule 9(2) read with Section 11A of the Act, not under Section 11D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 539 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191526</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal to consider substantial questions of law raised regarding recovery of duty under Rule 9(2) read with Section 11A of the Act, not under Section 11D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>