<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 32 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7450</link>
    <description>A partnership deed must be construed from its own terms: where it names four partners, a widow who signs for herself and as natural guardian of her minor son is treated as contracting in a representative capacity unless the deed clearly admits the minor as a full partner. The minor cannot be made liable as a full partner, and the absence of separate shares for the widow and minor does not invalidate the deed. A valid deed specifying the partners and their shares supports registration, and transitional provisions preserved proceedings under section 33B after repeal of the 1922 Act, so the Commissioner retained jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 32 - ASSAM AND NAGALAND High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7450</link>
      <description>A partnership deed must be construed from its own terms: where it names four partners, a widow who signs for herself and as natural guardian of her minor son is treated as contracting in a representative capacity unless the deed clearly admits the minor as a full partner. The minor cannot be made liable as a full partner, and the absence of separate shares for the widow and minor does not invalidate the deed. A valid deed specifying the partners and their shares supports registration, and transitional provisions preserved proceedings under section 33B after repeal of the 1922 Act, so the Commissioner retained jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>