<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1165 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191512</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found the appellant&#039;s errors to be bonafide, based on a genuine belief, and not deliberate attempts to conceal facts. The court emphasized that penalties should not be imposed for bonafide errors. The appeal was allowed, and the court disposed of the case accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1165 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191512</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found the appellant&#039;s errors to be bonafide, based on a genuine belief, and not deliberate attempts to conceal facts. The court emphasized that penalties should not be imposed for bonafide errors. The appeal was allowed, and the court disposed of the case accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>