<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1278 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191510</link>
    <description>The court directed the release of Lot No. 26 and 29 to the petitioner at the original offer price, along with 50% of the forfeited security amount, totaling to the benefit of both parties financially. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistency and fairness in Customs Department procedures, emphasizing the need for uniformity and adherence to commercial law principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 10:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1278 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191510</link>
      <description>The court directed the release of Lot No. 26 and 29 to the petitioner at the original offer price, along with 50% of the forfeited security amount, totaling to the benefit of both parties financially. The judgment highlighted the importance of consistency and fairness in Customs Department procedures, emphasizing the need for uniformity and adherence to commercial law principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>