<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 315 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191518</link>
    <description>A saving proviso preserving determinations and awards made for the pre-10 January 1968 period could not be read to extinguish the statutory appeal under Section 11 for compensation relating to the period after that date. Once the requisition was deemed to continue under the later Act, the compensation for the post-10 January 1968 period became subject to the appellate remedy provided by that Act. The objection to maintainability therefore succeeded only for the earlier period and failed for the later period, so the challenge was maintainable in part and the matter was remitted for merits on the post-10 January 1968 compensation claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 315 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191518</link>
      <description>A saving proviso preserving determinations and awards made for the pre-10 January 1968 period could not be read to extinguish the statutory appeal under Section 11 for compensation relating to the period after that date. Once the requisition was deemed to continue under the later Act, the compensation for the post-10 January 1968 period became subject to the appellate remedy provided by that Act. The objection to maintainability therefore succeeded only for the earlier period and failed for the later period, so the challenge was maintainable in part and the matter was remitted for merits on the post-10 January 1968 compensation claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>