<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 303 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341333</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer under Section 142A of the Income Tax Act due to the pending appeal. The Court also affirmed the use of local Public Works Department rates for determining the cost of construction, dismissing the appeal without costs and disposing of any pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2017 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 303 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341333</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer under Section 142A of the Income Tax Act due to the pending appeal. The Court also affirmed the use of local Public Works Department rates for determining the cost of construction, dismissing the appeal without costs and disposing of any pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>