<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 292 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing based on valid reasons presented by the appellant. Regarding the disallowance of labor charges under Sec. 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal held that the section could not be invoked for short-deduction of tax at source, directing the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 07:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 292 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing based on valid reasons presented by the appellant. Regarding the disallowance of labor charges under Sec. 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal held that the section could not be invoked for short-deduction of tax at source, directing the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>