<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 288 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341318</link>
    <description>House rent allowance exemption under section 10(13A) was denied because the claimed tenancy was not proved genuine. The assessee relied on cash rent receipts and later affidavits for alleged rent paid to her mother, but the surrounding facts pointed elsewhere: her residential address remained her own jointly owned flat, she lived there with her family, and there was no leave and licence agreement, bank proof of payment, society intimation, or other corroboration of tenancy at the mother&#039;s flat. The mother&#039;s failure to disclose the alleged rent in returns for several years further weakened the claim. Applying the burden of proof and human probabilities, the arrangement was treated as not bona fide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 288 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341318</link>
      <description>House rent allowance exemption under section 10(13A) was denied because the claimed tenancy was not proved genuine. The assessee relied on cash rent receipts and later affidavits for alleged rent paid to her mother, but the surrounding facts pointed elsewhere: her residential address remained her own jointly owned flat, she lived there with her family, and there was no leave and licence agreement, bank proof of payment, society intimation, or other corroboration of tenancy at the mother&#039;s flat. The mother&#039;s failure to disclose the alleged rent in returns for several years further weakened the claim. Applying the burden of proof and human probabilities, the arrangement was treated as not bona fide.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>