<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 283 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341313</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the demand of Service Tax on transport of goods by road services. It held that the Truck Operator Union transporting sugar cane for the appellant is not a Goods Transport Agency as per the defined provisions, thus not liable for Service Tax. The decision upheld the order setting aside the demand for Service Tax, concluding that the relevant legal provisions were not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 283 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341313</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the demand of Service Tax on transport of goods by road services. It held that the Truck Operator Union transporting sugar cane for the appellant is not a Goods Transport Agency as per the defined provisions, thus not liable for Service Tax. The decision upheld the order setting aside the demand for Service Tax, concluding that the relevant legal provisions were not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>