<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 279 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, holding that the credit on GP sheets could not be denied without corroborative evidence. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence in adjudicating cases involving allegations of fraudulent activities and the importance of adhering to statutory limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 279 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, holding that the credit on GP sheets could not be denied without corroborative evidence. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence in adjudicating cases involving allegations of fraudulent activities and the importance of adhering to statutory limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>