<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 260 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision to reject the declared value of the apple juice concentrate import, emphasizing the lack of compliance with Customs Valuation Rules and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal ruled that the subsequent enhancement of value was not justified, citing precedents and legal principles. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of procedural fairness and adherence to valuation rules in customs assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 260 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision to reject the declared value of the apple juice concentrate import, emphasizing the lack of compliance with Customs Valuation Rules and principles of natural justice. The Tribunal ruled that the subsequent enhancement of value was not justified, citing precedents and legal principles. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the significance of procedural fairness and adherence to valuation rules in customs assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>