<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 254 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341284</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the respondent-company, a private entity, was not performing public functions. Therefore, the petition was deemed not maintainable, and the petitioner was advised to pursue remedies through civil law. The court granted the petitioner the freedom to approach the Civil Court for redressal of her grievances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 254 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341284</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that the respondent-company, a private entity, was not performing public functions. Therefore, the petition was deemed not maintainable, and the petitioner was advised to pursue remedies through civil law. The court granted the petitioner the freedom to approach the Civil Court for redressal of her grievances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>