<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1282 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191493</link>
    <description>The addition for unexplained jewellery was held not fully sustainable because the assessee&#039;s explanation of marriage-linked acquisition was rejected for lack of corroboration, and the statement could not be relied on selectively. Once that explanation was discarded, the whole statement was ignored. The CBDT jewellery instruction was treated as a reasonable guide in assessment proceedings as well as search cases, reflecting customary possession of jewellery in ordinary Hindu families. Credit therefore had to be allowed for jewellery attributable to the assessee, her husband and daughters, and only the balance could be treated as unexplained and added.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1282 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191493</link>
      <description>The addition for unexplained jewellery was held not fully sustainable because the assessee&#039;s explanation of marriage-linked acquisition was rejected for lack of corroboration, and the statement could not be relied on selectively. Once that explanation was discarded, the whole statement was ignored. The CBDT jewellery instruction was treated as a reasonable guide in assessment proceedings as well as search cases, reflecting customary possession of jewellery in ordinary Hindu families. Credit therefore had to be allowed for jewellery attributable to the assessee, her husband and daughters, and only the balance could be treated as unexplained and added.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>