<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 701 - Securities and Exchange Board</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191490</link>
    <description>Regulation 10 of the 1994 Takeover Regulations was held to apply only where an existing shareholder acquires further shares from the open market beyond the prescribed threshold; it could not be extended to a person holding no shares when the regulations commenced. A privately negotiated acquisition supported by memoranda, allotment timing, transfer documents, and the unlisted status of the shares was treated as outside the open-market sweep of regulation 10 and within the exclusions for public-issue allotments and unlisted shares. On that basis, section 15H of the SEBI Act could not be invoked, and the penalty order was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 701 - Securities and Exchange Board</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191490</link>
      <description>Regulation 10 of the 1994 Takeover Regulations was held to apply only where an existing shareholder acquires further shares from the open market beyond the prescribed threshold; it could not be extended to a person holding no shares when the regulations commenced. A privately negotiated acquisition supported by memoranda, allotment timing, transfer documents, and the unlisted status of the shares was treated as outside the open-market sweep of regulation 10 and within the exclusions for public-issue allotments and unlisted shares. On that basis, section 15H of the SEBI Act could not be invoked, and the penalty order was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>