<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 609 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191484</link>
    <description>The court emphasized that there is no right to cross-examine witnesses before the reply to the show cause notice is filed and before adjudication commences. The petitioner&#039;s contention that the opportunity for cross-examination was denied due to non-supply of documents was considered, and the impugned order in this regard was set aside. The court held that the petitioner was provided with relied upon documents in the form of a DVD, but non-relied upon documents were not collected despite repeated requests. The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner should file a statutory appeal against the order in the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 14:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 609 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191484</link>
      <description>The court emphasized that there is no right to cross-examine witnesses before the reply to the show cause notice is filed and before adjudication commences. The petitioner&#039;s contention that the opportunity for cross-examination was denied due to non-supply of documents was considered, and the impugned order in this regard was set aside. The court held that the petitioner was provided with relied upon documents in the form of a DVD, but non-relied upon documents were not collected despite repeated requests. The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner should file a statutory appeal against the order in the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>