<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 643 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower court&#039;s decision, rejecting the appeal regarding misdeclaration of description and value of imported goods. The appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were of a lower grade and specifically manufactured for distribution in Bangladesh was not accepted, as the manufacturer&#039;s marking on both consignments indicated identical goods. The authorities deemed the appellant&#039;s explanations lacking credibility and established misdeclaration based on the manufacturer&#039;s markings. The judgment underscores the importance of accurate declaration of goods&#039; description and value in importation, emphasizing manufacturer&#039;s markings as evidence of grade and authenticity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 643 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower court&#039;s decision, rejecting the appeal regarding misdeclaration of description and value of imported goods. The appellant&#039;s argument that the goods were of a lower grade and specifically manufactured for distribution in Bangladesh was not accepted, as the manufacturer&#039;s marking on both consignments indicated identical goods. The authorities deemed the appellant&#039;s explanations lacking credibility and established misdeclaration based on the manufacturer&#039;s markings. The judgment underscores the importance of accurate declaration of goods&#039; description and value in importation, emphasizing manufacturer&#039;s markings as evidence of grade and authenticity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>