https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191473 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of demand of duty, finding it covered against the appellants on merits. Discrepancies in the Cenvat account balance and claimed abatement amount led to setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The appeal was partly allowed on the issue of penalty imposition, with the penalty on the appellants being overturned. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:40:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191473 The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of demand of duty, finding it covered against the appellants on merits. Discrepancies in the Cenvat account balance and claimed abatement amount led to setting aside the penalty under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The appeal was partly allowed on the issue of penalty imposition, with the penalty on the appellants being overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191473