https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191469 Preventive detention is not invalid merely because arrest follows the detention order after a gap, and omission to use proclamation or attachment procedures under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not by itself defeat the detention. Conduct involving repeated armed trespass, looting, and intimidation may amount to a disturbance of public order where its degree and impact shake public confidence and create panic, even if the same acts also constitute ordinary offences. The availability of criminal prosecution for past acts does not bar preventive detention, because punishment for crime and prevention of future prejudicial conduct operate in different fields. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:08:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191469 Preventive detention is not invalid merely because arrest follows the detention order after a gap, and omission to use proclamation or attachment procedures under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not by itself defeat the detention. Conduct involving repeated armed trespass, looting, and intimidation may amount to a disturbance of public order where its degree and impact shake public confidence and create panic, even if the same acts also constitute ordinary offences. The availability of criminal prosecution for past acts does not bar preventive detention, because punishment for crime and prevention of future prejudicial conduct operate in different fields. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191469