<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (10) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7435</link>
    <description>Where an assessment completed under the earlier Act gave rise to a refund only after commencement of the new Act, the transitional refund provisions of the new Act governed the claim for interest. Because the refund was made within the statutory six-month period after the order directing payment, the condition for liability to pay interest was not met, and no interest was payable on the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (10) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7435</link>
      <description>Where an assessment completed under the earlier Act gave rise to a refund only after commencement of the new Act, the transitional refund provisions of the new Act governed the claim for interest. Because the refund was made within the statutory six-month period after the order directing payment, the condition for liability to pay interest was not met, and no interest was payable on the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>