<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 251 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341281</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to delete the disallowance of a provision for expected loss/defect liability for Assessment Year 2005-2006. The Court found that the provision was made in accordance with agreements and due to the assessee&#039;s significant accumulated losses, with no intention to reduce tax liability. It concluded that the Tribunal did not err in deleting the disallowance, stating that no substantial question of law arose in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:07:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 251 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341281</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to delete the disallowance of a provision for expected loss/defect liability for Assessment Year 2005-2006. The Court found that the provision was made in accordance with agreements and due to the assessee&#039;s significant accumulated losses, with no intention to reduce tax liability. It concluded that the Tribunal did not err in deleting the disallowance, stating that no substantial question of law arose in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>