<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 249 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The additions for suppressed profits, unrecorded production, and bogus purchases were considered to be based on estimates and debatable issues. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that no penalty for concealment was justified, as the issues raised were substantial and required further legal consideration. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision to delete the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 249 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The additions for suppressed profits, unrecorded production, and bogus purchases were considered to be based on estimates and debatable issues. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that no penalty for concealment was justified, as the issues raised were substantial and required further legal consideration. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision to delete the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>