<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 239 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2005-06, partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, and allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2010-11 for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the disallowance issue related to investments in subsidiary companies and apply Section 14A read with Rule 8D to investments in mutual funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 239 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2005-06, partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, and allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2010-11 for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the disallowance issue related to investments in subsidiary companies and apply Section 14A read with Rule 8D to investments in mutual funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>