<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 238 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341268</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT, directing the Ld. AO to delete the addition made under Section 14A for investments in sister concerns. The ITAT emphasized that Section 14A should apply only if investments were made from borrowed funds. The matter was remitted back to the Ld. AO for a fresh assessment in accordance with law and merits, with a specific directive to recompute disallowance if investments were made from borrowed funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 238 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341268</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT, directing the Ld. AO to delete the addition made under Section 14A for investments in sister concerns. The ITAT emphasized that Section 14A should apply only if investments were made from borrowed funds. The matter was remitted back to the Ld. AO for a fresh assessment in accordance with law and merits, with a specific directive to recompute disallowance if investments were made from borrowed funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>