<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 233 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation issue to the Departmental Valuation Officer and frame the assessment accordingly. The reopening of the assessment under section 147 was upheld, while the assessee&#039;s request for a valuation reference under section 50C was accepted. The issue of interest levy under sections 234B and 234C was deemed infructuous at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 233 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to refer the valuation issue to the Departmental Valuation Officer and frame the assessment accordingly. The reopening of the assessment under section 147 was upheld, while the assessee&#039;s request for a valuation reference under section 50C was accepted. The issue of interest levy under sections 234B and 234C was deemed infructuous at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>