<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 224 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed a fresh decision in a case concerning the inclusion of salvaged diamonds in the assessable value of newly manufactured diamond drilling bits. The lower authorities had imposed a differential duty demand based on a 100% valuation of salvaged diamonds, contrary to the appellant&#039;s claimed 40%. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to consider evidence supporting the lower valuation and violated principles of natural justice. The case was remanded for a new decision, emphasizing the importance of following prior directives and providing the appellant with a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:05:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 224 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed a fresh decision in a case concerning the inclusion of salvaged diamonds in the assessable value of newly manufactured diamond drilling bits. The lower authorities had imposed a differential duty demand based on a 100% valuation of salvaged diamonds, contrary to the appellant&#039;s claimed 40%. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to consider evidence supporting the lower valuation and violated principles of natural justice. The case was remanded for a new decision, emphasizing the importance of following prior directives and providing the appellant with a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>