<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 221 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341251</link>
    <description>Amounts recovered from a buyer for reduced lifting or curtailed production, described as debit-note recoveries, are treated as compensation or liquidated damages rather than additional consideration for excisable goods, so they are not includible in assessable value and Rule 6 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules does not apply on those facts. Credit reversal is not required where unused inputs remain in the factory, are not written off, and are used in the manufacture of other goods. A director&#039;s penalty is not sustainable absent a specific role or distinct culpable violation, particularly where the dispute turns on valuation and input-credit interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 221 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341251</link>
      <description>Amounts recovered from a buyer for reduced lifting or curtailed production, described as debit-note recoveries, are treated as compensation or liquidated damages rather than additional consideration for excisable goods, so they are not includible in assessable value and Rule 6 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules does not apply on those facts. Credit reversal is not required where unused inputs remain in the factory, are not written off, and are used in the manufacture of other goods. A director&#039;s penalty is not sustainable absent a specific role or distinct culpable violation, particularly where the dispute turns on valuation and input-credit interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>