<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 202 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341232</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the petitions challenging public notices related to customs regulations and jurisdiction under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners, acting as agents for Container Shipping Lines/Carriers, sought withdrawal of the notices, alleging misinterpretation of the Act and regulations by customs authorities. The court acknowledged the maintainability objection raised by the Additional Solicitor General, emphasizing that jurisdiction and competence challenges could be raised during the adjudication process. The court granted the petitioners extended time to respond to show cause notices and ensured no coercive recoveries pending adjudication, assuring a fair process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 202 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341232</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the petitions challenging public notices related to customs regulations and jurisdiction under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioners, acting as agents for Container Shipping Lines/Carriers, sought withdrawal of the notices, alleging misinterpretation of the Act and regulations by customs authorities. The court acknowledged the maintainability objection raised by the Additional Solicitor General, emphasizing that jurisdiction and competence challenges could be raised during the adjudication process. The court granted the petitioners extended time to respond to show cause notices and ensured no coercive recoveries pending adjudication, assuring a fair process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>