<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 201 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341231</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the challenge to the initiation of the Countervailing Duty/Anti-Subsidy Investigation on Hot Rolled and Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Flat Products from China. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding the flawed investigation process and circumvention of anti-dumping proceedings were not upheld. The Court found no obligation for the Designated Authority to rule on objections preliminarily, allowing the investigation to proceed. The petitioner was advised to present concerns to the Designated Authority for detailed consideration. Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed, permitting the investigation to continue based on the presented arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:03:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 201 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341231</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the challenge to the initiation of the Countervailing Duty/Anti-Subsidy Investigation on Hot Rolled and Cold Rolled Stainless Steel Flat Products from China. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding the flawed investigation process and circumvention of anti-dumping proceedings were not upheld. The Court found no obligation for the Designated Authority to rule on objections preliminarily, allowing the investigation to proceed. The petitioner was advised to present concerns to the Designated Authority for detailed consideration. Ultimately, the writ petition was dismissed, permitting the investigation to continue based on the presented arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>