<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 196 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341226</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported oil as waste oil rather than furnace oil due to inconclusive testing. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs, considering the misunderstanding in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:03:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 196 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341226</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported oil as waste oil rather than furnace oil due to inconclusive testing. The penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 3 lakhs, considering the misunderstanding in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>