https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191451 The High Court addressed a case involving a challenge to an order by the Commissioner of Customs regarding seized goods. Despite objections to the Writ Petition's maintainability due to a statutory remedy, the Court decided to expunge certain remarks from the Commissioner's order. The petitioners were directed to appeal to the Tribunal, which was instructed to review the order without limitations. An interim order was granted in favor of the petitioner until the Tribunal's decision, with a resolution timeline of four months and no costs imposed on either party. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Apr 2017 18:17:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191451 The High Court addressed a case involving a challenge to an order by the Commissioner of Customs regarding seized goods. Despite objections to the Writ Petition's maintainability due to a statutory remedy, the Court decided to expunge certain remarks from the Commissioner's order. The petitioners were directed to appeal to the Tribunal, which was instructed to review the order without limitations. An interim order was granted in favor of the petitioner until the Tribunal's decision, with a resolution timeline of four months and no costs imposed on either party. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191451