<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (4) TMI 205 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191448</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order declaring the Amending Acts void. The Court held that the Acts were not unconstitutional, falling under entry 35 of the Concurrent List and not violating Art. 301 of the Constitution. The judgment affirmed the State Legislature&#039;s competence to amend taxation laws, dismissing the respondent&#039;s arguments and upholding the validity of the Amending Acts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (4) TMI 205 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191448</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s order declaring the Amending Acts void. The Court held that the Acts were not unconstitutional, falling under entry 35 of the Concurrent List and not violating Art. 301 of the Constitution. The judgment affirmed the State Legislature&#039;s competence to amend taxation laws, dismissing the respondent&#039;s arguments and upholding the validity of the Amending Acts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>