https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191446 Writ interference with provisional anti-dumping duty is limited where an alternative statutory remedy is available and the impugned notification is not shown to be perverse or arbitrary. The High Court noted that provisional duty is temporary pending determination of normal value and dumping margin, and that the designated authority had relied on material collected under the prescribed procedure. It also recorded that the exporters' responses were deficient and that the record indicated dumping and injury to the domestic industry. On that basis, the writ challenge to the preliminary findings and provisional duty was not entertained. en-us Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:31:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191446 Writ interference with provisional anti-dumping duty is limited where an alternative statutory remedy is available and the impugned notification is not shown to be perverse or arbitrary. The High Court noted that provisional duty is temporary pending determination of normal value and dumping margin, and that the designated authority had relied on material collected under the prescribed procedure. It also recorded that the exporters' responses were deficient and that the record indicated dumping and injury to the domestic industry. On that basis, the writ challenge to the preliminary findings and provisional duty was not entertained. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191446