https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191443 In an appeal against acquittal, the SC reiterated that interference is justified only when the trial court's view is plainly unsustainable, not merely because another view is possible. The prosecution's circumstantial case failed because the alleged last-seen and trunk-removal witnesses were disbelieved for unnatural conduct, delayed disclosures, and material contradictions, and the claimed recovery of blood-stained articles was unreliable after prior search and sealing of the flat. Even if last-seen evidence was accepted, it did not complete the chain needed to prove murder or disappearance of evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The acquittal was restored. en-us Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191443 In an appeal against acquittal, the SC reiterated that interference is justified only when the trial court's view is plainly unsustainable, not merely because another view is possible. The prosecution's circumstantial case failed because the alleged last-seen and trunk-removal witnesses were disbelieved for unnatural conduct, delayed disclosures, and material contradictions, and the claimed recovery of blood-stained articles was unreliable after prior search and sealing of the flat. Even if last-seen evidence was accepted, it did not complete the chain needed to prove murder or disappearance of evidence beyond reasonable doubt. The acquittal was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191443