<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 182 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341212</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Department on most issues. The assessee was allowed a deduction under Section 80-I for old machinery but denied the classification of a forklift as plant and machinery. The court adjusted the gross profit estimation to 32% and upheld the disallowance of certain expenses under Section 40A(2)(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 10:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 182 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341212</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Department on most issues. The assessee was allowed a deduction under Section 80-I for old machinery but denied the classification of a forklift as plant and machinery. The court adjusted the gross profit estimation to 32% and upheld the disallowance of certain expenses under Section 40A(2)(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>