<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 178 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341208</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed as the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions, including income from the sand business, unexplained investments in vehicles and properties, and income from various business operations, were upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter these additions, leading to the dismissal of all grounds of appeal. The judgment was delivered on 31st March 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 178 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341208</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed as the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions, including income from the sand business, unexplained investments in vehicles and properties, and income from various business operations, were upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter these additions, leading to the dismissal of all grounds of appeal. The judgment was delivered on 31st March 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>