<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 173 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341203</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee to set off accumulated unabsorbed depreciation for AYs 2001-02 to 2003-04 against income from other sources in AY 2007-08. The Tribunal held that unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years should be treated similarly to current year&#039;s depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, allowing for set off against current year&#039;s income beyond &#039;profits and gains of business or profession&#039;. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, affirming the allowance of set off, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:59:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 173 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341203</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee to set off accumulated unabsorbed depreciation for AYs 2001-02 to 2003-04 against income from other sources in AY 2007-08. The Tribunal held that unabsorbed depreciation from earlier years should be treated similarly to current year&#039;s depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, allowing for set off against current year&#039;s income beyond &#039;profits and gains of business or profession&#039;. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, affirming the allowance of set off, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>