<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 169 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition under Section 41(1) for the cessation of liability amounting to Rs. 7,87,19,819/-, as the assessee&#039;s marketing scheme had lapsed, and the liability ceased to exist. The additional evidence was deemed irrelevant, and cited legal precedents were found inapplicable. The Tribunal highlighted that reopening assessments for the year of cessation would increase the tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 169 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition under Section 41(1) for the cessation of liability amounting to Rs. 7,87,19,819/-, as the assessee&#039;s marketing scheme had lapsed, and the liability ceased to exist. The additional evidence was deemed irrelevant, and cited legal precedents were found inapplicable. The Tribunal highlighted that reopening assessments for the year of cessation would increase the tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>