<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 159 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to reevaluate the refund claim in accordance with Section 11B and pertinent case law. The appeal was granted for further consideration and determination based on the legal principles outlined, emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory time limits for refund claims under the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 159 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to reevaluate the refund claim in accordance with Section 11B and pertinent case law. The appeal was granted for further consideration and determination based on the legal principles outlined, emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory time limits for refund claims under the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>