https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341173 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals, overturning the Commissioner's decision to reject the appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on various items used in manufacturing excisable goods. The Tribunal held that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the usage of the items as inputs for the fabrication of capital goods, making them eligible for Cenvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules. As a result, the Tribunal granted the appellant the Cenvat credit on the disputed items and provided them with consequential benefits as per the law. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341173 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeals, overturning the Commissioner's decision to reject the appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on various items used in manufacturing excisable goods. The Tribunal held that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate the usage of the items as inputs for the fabrication of capital goods, making them eligible for Cenvat credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules. As a result, the Tribunal granted the appellant the Cenvat credit on the disputed items and provided them with consequential benefits as per the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341173