https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341168 Anticipatory bail was found appropriate where the petitioner was not yet arrayed as an accused, had only received notice to appear, and the materials did not establish beyond reasonable doubt that he was manufacturing ketamine or possessing it for sale or export. The Court treated the apprehension of arrest as well founded, noted that the alleged offence was not one exclusively punishable with death or life imprisonment, and considered the grant of bail to a co-accused as a relevant factor. Anticipatory bail was therefore granted subject to conditions. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:56:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341168 Anticipatory bail was found appropriate where the petitioner was not yet arrayed as an accused, had only received notice to appear, and the materials did not establish beyond reasonable doubt that he was manufacturing ketamine or possessing it for sale or export. The Court treated the apprehension of arrest as well founded, noted that the alleged offence was not one exclusively punishable with death or life imprisonment, and considered the grant of bail to a co-accused as a relevant factor. Anticipatory bail was therefore granted subject to conditions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341168