<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 137 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341167</link>
    <description>The High Court granted the appellant&#039;s appeal for restoration after it was dismissed by the CESTAT due to failure to deposit the required sum. The Court emphasized that a mistake of law by counsel should not prejudice the party. The appellant was allowed to file an application seeking exemption from the pre-deposit condition due to financial hardship, and the CESTAT was directed to consider the application. The appeal was restored before the CESTAT for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 137 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341167</link>
      <description>The High Court granted the appellant&#039;s appeal for restoration after it was dismissed by the CESTAT due to failure to deposit the required sum. The Court emphasized that a mistake of law by counsel should not prejudice the party. The appellant was allowed to file an application seeking exemption from the pre-deposit condition due to financial hardship, and the CESTAT was directed to consider the application. The appeal was restored before the CESTAT for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>