<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 131 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition due to non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, specifically Section 68 governing share buy-backs. It held that transferred cases must adhere to the 2013 Act, rejecting arguments for the 1956 Act&#039;s applicability. The Tribunal emphasized that no vested rights under the 1956 Act could override the 2013 Act&#039;s provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:56:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 131 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition due to non-compliance with the mandatory provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, specifically Section 68 governing share buy-backs. It held that transferred cases must adhere to the 2013 Act, rejecting arguments for the 1956 Act&#039;s applicability. The Tribunal emphasized that no vested rights under the 1956 Act could override the 2013 Act&#039;s provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>