<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1340 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191435</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disallowances of royalty expenditure and travelling expenses, as well as the addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The judgments were delivered collectively without specifying individual judges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:54:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1340 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191435</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disallowances of royalty expenditure and travelling expenses, as well as the addition under section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The judgments were delivered collectively without specifying individual judges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>