<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 8 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7406</link>
    <description>The lands at Begumpet, Lallaguda, Jiaguda, Subzimandi, Yerragedda Zamboorkhana, and Vicarabad were held to qualify as &quot;agricultural lands&quot; under section 2(e)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court adopted a liberal interpretation, focusing on the potential agricultural use of the land rather than actual cultivation. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling that these lands should be excluded from the calculation of net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 8 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7406</link>
      <description>The lands at Begumpet, Lallaguda, Jiaguda, Subzimandi, Yerragedda Zamboorkhana, and Vicarabad were held to qualify as &quot;agricultural lands&quot; under section 2(e)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The court adopted a liberal interpretation, focusing on the potential agricultural use of the land rather than actual cultivation. The judgment favored the assessee, ruling that these lands should be excluded from the calculation of net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>