<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 6 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7394</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled on various issues related to the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the need for provisional tax assessments to be conducted promptly based on filed returns and documents, considering depreciation and carried forward losses. The court affirmed the Income-tax Officer&#039;s authority to verify assessable income accuracy and adherence to tax provisions. It clarified rules for carrying forward losses and scrutinized deductions, invalidating a demand notice due to an error in deduction assessment. The court favored the petitioner, quashing the demand and allowing a fresh assessment by the Income-tax Officer, with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 6 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7394</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled on various issues related to the Income-tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the need for provisional tax assessments to be conducted promptly based on filed returns and documents, considering depreciation and carried forward losses. The court affirmed the Income-tax Officer&#039;s authority to verify assessable income accuracy and adherence to tax provisions. It clarified rules for carrying forward losses and scrutinized deductions, invalidating a demand notice due to an error in deduction assessment. The court favored the petitioner, quashing the demand and allowing a fresh assessment by the Income-tax Officer, with costs awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>