<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>How will the applicant prove that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply in his case?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=24582</link>
    <description>Proof that unjust enrichment does not apply requires different evidence by claim size: for lower-value GST refund claims, a self-declaration based on available documentary or other evidence certifying that the tax incidence was not passed on is sufficient; for higher-value claims, a certificate from a chartered accountant or cost accountant certifying that the incidence of tax was not passed on is required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>How will the applicant prove that the principle of unjust enrichment does not apply in his case?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=24582</link>
      <description>Proof that unjust enrichment does not apply requires different evidence by claim size: for lower-value GST refund claims, a self-declaration based on available documentary or other evidence certifying that the tax incidence was not passed on is sufficient; for higher-value claims, a certificate from a chartered accountant or cost accountant certifying that the incidence of tax was not passed on is required.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Bills</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=24582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>