<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (9) TMI 20 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7385</link>
    <description>Brokerage received by the assessee on behalf of brokers, and required under the relevant bye-laws to be passed on in full, was a liability at the time of receipt and not a trading receipt. The character of the amount had to be determined when received; later retention or appropriation could not convert a liability into income. On that basis, the unutilised balance of brokerage carried forward as a liability did not acquire the character of taxable income and was held not to be assessable as the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (9) TMI 20 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7385</link>
      <description>Brokerage received by the assessee on behalf of brokers, and required under the relevant bye-laws to be passed on in full, was a liability at the time of receipt and not a trading receipt. The character of the amount had to be determined when received; later retention or appropriation could not convert a liability into income. On that basis, the unutilised balance of brokerage carried forward as a liability did not acquire the character of taxable income and was held not to be assessable as the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>