<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (8) TMI 35 -  DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7381</link>
    <description>Expenditure on linen, blankets and uniforms acquired at the commencement of a hotel business was capital in nature because it formed part of the initial equipment of the income-earning apparatus, not a recurring revenue outlay, and the method of accounting could not change that character. Licence fees from stall-holders had accrued in full during the accounting year because no enforceable arrangement reducing them existed at that time; later resolutions and book entries did not defeat accrual. An amount written off as a likely reduction in licence fees could not be excluded where the income had already arisen, so the sum remained taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (8) TMI 35 -  DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7381</link>
      <description>Expenditure on linen, blankets and uniforms acquired at the commencement of a hotel business was capital in nature because it formed part of the initial equipment of the income-earning apparatus, not a recurring revenue outlay, and the method of accounting could not change that character. Licence fees from stall-holders had accrued in full during the accounting year because no enforceable arrangement reducing them existed at that time; later resolutions and book entries did not defeat accrual. An amount written off as a likely reduction in licence fees could not be excluded where the income had already arisen, so the sum remained taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>