<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7367</link>
    <description>Payment made to terminate an onerous managing agency arrangement was treated as revenue expenditure and therefore allowable as a business deduction. The payment was incurred because the existing agency had become commercially inconvenient and carried recurring liabilities, and it was directed to the conduct of the assessee-company&#039;s existing trade. As it did not bring into existence any new asset, right, privilege, or other enduring capital advantage, and was not connected with the initiation or expansion of a new business, it was not capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7367</link>
      <description>Payment made to terminate an onerous managing agency arrangement was treated as revenue expenditure and therefore allowable as a business deduction. The payment was incurred because the existing agency had become commercially inconvenient and carried recurring liabilities, and it was directed to the conduct of the assessee-company&#039;s existing trade. As it did not bring into existence any new asset, right, privilege, or other enduring capital advantage, and was not connected with the initiation or expansion of a new business, it was not capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>