<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7357</link>
    <description>The court determined that the liability of Rs. 31,26,000 incurred by the assessee for purchasing assets from Kellner was a debt owed under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court rejected the revenue&#039;s argument linking the liability to shares, emphasizing the separate nature of the transactions and entities involved. It was held that the liability should be deducted in computing net wealth. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs and counsel&#039;s fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7357</link>
      <description>The court determined that the liability of Rs. 31,26,000 incurred by the assessee for purchasing assets from Kellner was a debt owed under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court rejected the revenue&#039;s argument linking the liability to shares, emphasizing the separate nature of the transactions and entities involved. It was held that the liability should be deducted in computing net wealth. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs and counsel&#039;s fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>